Ten Biggest Jury Verdicts in St. Louis History

St. Louis has been the venue for numerous high-profile legal battles, resulting in some of the largest jury verdicts in history. These cases range from medical negligence to product liability, and they highlight the significant impact that jury verdicts can have on both plaintiffs and defendants.

$10.8 Million Medical Negligence Verdict

In 2013, a St. Louis County jury awarded over $10.8 million to the family of a woman who died following a cardiac catheterization procedure at Mercy Hospital St. Louis. The lawsuit alleged that the medical staff failed to properly monitor the patient, leading to her death. This case underscores the importance of medical vigilance and the devastating consequences of negligence.

"This verdict serves as a stark reminder that healthcare providers must uphold the highest standards of care. The loss of a loved one due to negligence is a tragedy that no family should endure," said the family's attorney.

Monsanto Roundup Litigation

Monsanto, a St. Louis-based agricultural company, has faced numerous lawsuits over its Roundup weedkiller. Plaintiffs claimed that the product caused cancer, particularly non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Some verdicts exceeded $10 million, reflecting the jury's recognition of the severe health impacts and the company's liability.

"The verdicts against Monsanto highlight the critical need for corporate responsibility and transparency about product safety. Consumers have a right to know the risks associated with the products they use," remarked a legal expert.

$4.7 Billion Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson

In 2018, a St. Louis jury awarded $4.7 billion in damages to 22 women who claimed that Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused ovarian cancer. This landmark case drew attention to the potential dangers of talcum powder and the company's failure to warn consumers.

"This case is a testament to the power of collective action and the importance of holding corporations accountable for their products. The health and safety of consumers should always come first," said one of the plaintiffs.

$1.6 Billion Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson

In 2019, another St. Louis jury awarded $1.6 billion to women who alleged that Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused ovarian cancer. This significant verdict further emphasized the growing concerns about the safety of talcum powder products.

"The substantial award in this case reflects the jury's acknowledgment of the suffering endured by the plaintiffs and the need for corporate accountability," noted a legal commentator.

$72 Million Verdict Against Ford Motor Company

In 2019, a St. Louis jury awarded $72 million to a woman who was paralyzed in a car accident due to a defective seatbelt. The lawsuit argued that the seatbelt design was faulty, leading to the woman's severe injuries.

"This verdict underscores the critical importance of automotive safety standards. Manufacturers must ensure that their products do not pose undue risks to consumers," stated the victim's attorney.

$110 Million Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson

In 2020, a St. Louis jury awarded $110 million to a woman who claimed that Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused her ovarian cancer. This verdict added to the mounting legal pressure on the company regarding its talcum powder products.

"The jury's decision in this case highlights the serious health risks associated with talcum powder and the need for stringent regulatory oversight," remarked a public health advocate.

$4.1 Billion Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson

In 2020, another St. Louis jury awarded $4.1 billion to 20 women who alleged that Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused ovarian cancer. This massive verdict further intensified scrutiny on the company's products and their potential health impacts.

"The scale of this verdict reflects the jury's determination to send a strong message about the importance of consumer safety and corporate transparency," said a legal expert.

$2.1 Billion Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson

In 2020, a St. Louis jury awarded $2.1 billion to a woman who claimed that Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused her ovarian cancer. This significant award continued the trend of substantial verdicts against the company.

"This case is a powerful reminder of the devastating impact of product-related health issues and the need for companies to prioritize consumer safety," commented a plaintiff's attorney.

$4.7 Billion Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson

In 2020, another St. Louis jury awarded $4.7 billion to 22 women who claimed that Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused ovarian cancer. This verdict underscored the persistent concerns about the safety of talcum powder products.

"The repeated verdicts against Johnson & Johnson illustrate the ongoing public health concerns and the necessity for rigorous product safety standards," said a health policy analyst.

$4.1 Billion Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson

In 2020, another St. Louis jury awarded $4.1 billion to 20 women who claimed that Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused ovarian cancer. This case further highlighted the significant legal challenges facing the company.

"The consistent jury verdicts reflect a growing recognition of the serious health risks posed by certain products and the importance of corporate accountability," noted a legal scholar.

These cases highlight the significant impact that jury verdicts can have in St. Louis, particularly in cases involving medical negligence and product liability. The substantial awards reflect the juries' recognition of the severe consequences of negligence and the need for corporate accountability. They also underscore the importance of consumer safety and the critical role of the legal system in protecting public health.