A car accident can lead to catastrophic medical expenses, often exceeding hundreds of thousands of dollars. When insurance companies deny coverage—whether due to disputed liability, policy exclusions, or bad faith tactics—patients face financial ruin without a proper strategy. This article provides a sophisticated, multi-pronged approach...
Dental Malpractice in Missouri: Law and Claim Process
Dental malpractice occurs when a dentist, oral surgeon, or other dental professional fails to meet the standard of care, resulting in patient harm. Missouri, like other states, has specific legal frameworks governing these claims—from proving negligence to navigating strict filing deadlines. Whether you suffered from a botched root canal, surgical error, or misdiagnosis, understanding Missouri's dental malpractice laws is essential for pursuing justice.
1. Dental Malpractice Requires Proof of Four Key Elements
Fact: To succeed in a dental malpractice claim, plaintiffs must prove duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Elaboration:
Duty: The dentist-patient relationship must be established, confirming the dentist owed a professional duty of care.
Breach: The plaintiff must show the dentist deviated from the accepted standard of care (e.g., improper extraction leading to nerve damage).
Causation: The breach must directly cause the injury (e.g., an infection due to unsanitary tools).
Damages: The patient must demonstrate quantifiable harm (e.g., medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering).
Unlike general negligence claims, dental malpractice often hinges on expert testimony to define the standard of care and confirm the breach. Missouri courts require a qualified dental expert to testify that the defendant's actions fell below professional norms.
2. Missouri Imposes a Strict Two-Year Statute of Limitations
Fact: Dental malpractice lawsuits must be filed within two years of the negligent act or discovery of the injury.
Elaboration:
Missouri's statute of limitations (RSMo § 516.105) is stricter than many states. The clock starts either:
On the date of the negligent procedure, or
When the patient reasonably should have discovered the injury (the "discovery rule").
However, absolute limits apply—no case can be filed more than 10 years after the malpractice occurred, even if discovered later. Delayed-onset complications (e.g., TMJ disorder from improper bite adjustment) require prompt legal action once symptoms manifest. Missing the deadline permanently bars the claim, making early consultation with a malpractice attorney critical.
3. Missouri Has a Cap on Non-Economic Damages
Fact: State law limits pain-and-suffering payouts to $400,000 in most dental malpractice cases.
Elaboration:
Under RSMo § 538.210, non-economic damages (e.g., emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life) are capped, while economic damages (medical bills, lost income) remain uncapped.
Exceptions exist for:
Catastrophic injuries (e.g., permanent facial paralysis), where the cap increases to $700,000.
Wrongful death claims, which follow separate limits.
This cap significantly impacts settlement negotiations, as insurers know plaintiffs cannot recover unlimited compensation for intangible harms.
4. Missouri Requires a "Affidavit of Merit" to File a Claim
Fact: Before suing, plaintiffs must submit an affidavit from a qualified dental expert confirming the claim's validity.
Elaboration:
The affidavit must:
Be signed by a licensed dentist in the same specialty as the defendant.
State that the defendant breached the standard of care and caused harm.
Failure to file this affidavit results in dismissal. This rule prevents frivolous lawsuits but also adds cost and complexity to legitimate claims.
5. Comparative Negligence Can Reduce Compensation
Fact: If the patient is partially at fault (e.g., failing to follow post-op care instructions), their recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault.
Elaboration:
Missouri follows a pure comparative negligence system (RSMo § 537.765). Even if a patient is 99% at fault, they can still recover 1% of damages. However, most dental malpractice cases involve minimal patient fault unless there was clear neglect (e.g., ignoring severe infection symptoms).
6. Dental Malpractice Claims Often Settle Out of Court
Fact: The majority of cases resolve through negotiated settlements rather than trials.
Elaboration:
Insurers prefer settlements to avoid unpredictable jury verdicts. Factors influencing settlement value include:
Severity of injury (e.g., nerve damage vs. minor discomfort).
Strength of expert testimony.
Defendant's insurance policy limits.
A skilled malpractice attorney can leverage pre-trial discovery (e.g., depositions, dental records) to pressure insurers into fair settlements.
7. Common Types of Dental Malpractice Claims in Missouri
Fact: The most frequently litigated errors include:
Surgical mistakes (e.g., nerve damage from implants).
Failure to diagnose oral cancer.
Anesthesia errors.
Improper root canals leading to infections.
Elaboration:
Missouri courts see a high volume of nerve injury cases, particularly involving inferior alveolar nerve damage during wisdom tooth removal. These often result in permanent numbness or chronic pain, warranting substantial damages.
8. Dentists' Insurance Carriers Play a Major Role
Fact: Most claims are paid by professional liability insurance, not individual dentists.
Elaboration:
Insurers often:
Drag out negotiations to pressure plaintiffs.
Dispute causation (e.g., claiming a pre-existing condition caused the harm).
Impose lowball settlement offers.
An attorney familiar with insurer tactics can counter these strategies effectively.
9. The Missouri Board of Dentistry Investigates Complaints
Fact: Patients can file administrative complaints for disciplinary action.
Elaboration:
While the Board cannot award compensation, its findings (e.g., license suspension) can strengthen a civil lawsuit.
10. Choosing the Right Attorney is Critical
Fact: Dental malpractice cases require specialized legal and medical knowledge.
Elaboration:
Look for attorneys with:
Proven success in dental malpractice.
Relationships with dental experts.
Trial experience (to maximize leverage in settlement talks).
Conclusion
Dental malpractice claims in Missouri involve complex legal and medical issues, from expert affidavits to damage caps. Victims must act swiftly to preserve their rights. If you suspect negligence, consult a Missouri dental malpractice attorney immediately to assess your case.
Latest posts in our blog
Be the first to read what's new!
Structured settlements are financial instruments designed to provide long-term, tax-advantaged income streams to plaintiffs in legal cases. However, when recipients require liquidity, they may consider selling their future payments to a third-party buyer. The valuation of a structured settlement is a complex process that incorporates time value of...
The decision between selling a structured settlement partially or in full represents one of the most consequential financial choices a payee can make. These transactions—governed by a complex interplay of state and federal laws—carry dramatically different implications for long-term financial security, tax exposure, and liquidity management. This...
In an era where litigation expenses routinely outpace plaintiffs' financial reserves, pre-lawsuit funding has emerged as both a lifeline and a potential pitfall for cash-strapped claimants. These controversial financial instruments—marketed as "lawsuit loans" but structured as non-recourse advances—have created a $17 billion shadow industry that...